USPTO serial 73504011
SASSY SAUCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 1986
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SASSY SAUCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD C. MISKIN
HOWARD C MISKIN350 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | MUSTARD AND SAUCES EXCLUDING APPLESAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAPLAN, H.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CAPLAN, H.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLIED OLD ENGLISH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAPLAN, H.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SASSY SAUCES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 6, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |