Drawing for BIGG'S TRUE MINIMUM PRICING

USPTO serial 73504077

BIGG'S TRUE MINIMUM PRICING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIGG'S TRUE MINIMUM PRICING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES H. HAYES

JAMES H HAYES C/O FROST & JACOBS2500 CENTRAL TRUST CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RETAIL GROCERY AND GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORE SERVICESABANDONEDOct 16, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 19, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 3, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 15, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 1985CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance