USPTO serial 73504190
LA SUPREMA AUTHENTIC TORTILLA CHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1659040Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 1991
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LA SUPREMA AUTHENTIC TORTILLA CHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCHESTER, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
Rochester, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B SALAI
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | TORTILLA CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Agrilink Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LA SUPREMA AUTHENTIC TORTILLA CHIPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 1991 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |