USPTO serial 73504279
LA SUPREMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1496924Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 1988
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA SUPREMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCHESTER, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN B. SALAI
Linden Oaks Corporation103 Foulk Road, Suite 290Wilmington, DE 19803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | TORTILLA CHIPS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURTICE-BURNS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LA SUPREMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1991 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 1991 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |