Drawing for PAINT PRODUCTS CO.

USPTO serial 73504654

PAINT PRODUCTS CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAINT PRODUCTS CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARMAND CIFELLI

SOUTHPORT ARMAND CIFELLI & JAMES R FREDERICK181 OLD POST RDP O BOX 59, CT 09490

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PAINTS AND COATINGS, NAMELY ALKYD, OIL, LATEX, URETHANE AND EPOXY BASED PAINTS AND COATINGS; LIQUID WALLPAPER ADHESIVE PASTE; SOLVENTS; AND PAINTERS SUPPLIES, NAMELY BRUSHES AND ROLLERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 8, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 25, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 25, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 24, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance