Drawing for EXCELLENCE IN THIN FILMS

USPTO serial 73505362

EXCELLENCE IN THIN FILMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1375575Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 1985
Examiner
—
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EXCELLENCE IN THIN FILMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD S. WRIGHT

EDWARD S WRIGHT FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON, ET ALSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009OPTICAL PRODUCTS NAMELY, ANTIGLARE PANELS FOR VISUAL DISPLAYS, OPTICAL DATA DISCS, FLEXIBLE SELECTIVE ENERGY CONTROL SHEETS, ULTRAVIOLET FILTERS, DICHROIC FILTERS, NARROW BANDPASS FILTERS, VISIBLE FILTERS, COLOR SEPARATION FILTERS, BANDPASS FILTERS, BEAM SPLITTER FILTERS, INFRARED FILTERS - NAMELY, SQUARE BAND FILTERS, LONG AND SHORT WAVE PASS FILTERS AND WIDE BANDPASS FILTERS - MULTICOLOR RETICLES, CIRCULAR VARIABLE FILTERS, DUAL BAND FILTERS, ELECTRO MAGNETIC INTERFERENCE/RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE (EMI/RFI) FILTERS, FRONT SURFACE MIRRORS, TRANSPARENT MIRRORS, LASER OPTICS, COATINGS SOLD AS A PART OF OPTICAL ELEMENTS, COATINGS SOLD AS A PART OF LASER OPTICS, THERMAL CONTROL COATINGS SOLD AS A PART OF THERMAL CONTROL ELEMENTS, AND ANTIREFLECTION COATINGS SOLD AS A PART OF OPTICAL ELEMENTS; MAGNETIC COATINGS SOLD AS A PART OF MAGNETIC MEDIASECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 31, 1967

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 5, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 27, 1991C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 5, 1991RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Oct 18, 1991PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jun 24, 1991815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 24, 1991815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 17, 1985R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 8, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 1985CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance