USPTO serial 73506577
GIALLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIALLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
REGGIO EMILIA, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & REZAC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | TUNICS, TROUSERS, TOPS AND SHIRTS, TOPS AND TROUSERS, MANTELS, JACKETS, LUMBER JACKETS, LONG JACKETS, WAISTCOATS, CARDIGANS, JERSEY PULLOVERS, BUSH SHIRTS; BUSH SHIRTS IN COMBINATION WITH TUNICS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, SKIRTS AND TOPS, TROUSERS AND TOPS, SKIRTS AND CHEMISES, TROUSERS AND CHEMISES; CHEMISES IN COMBINATION WITH JACKETS AND SKIRTS, JACKETS AND TROUSERS, WAISTCOATS AND SKIRTS, JACKETS AND WAISTCOATS AND TROUSERS, CARDIGANS AND SKIRTS, LUMBER JACKETS AND BUSH SHIRTS AND SKIRTS, CARDIGANS IN COMBINATION WITH TUNICS, SKIRTS AND TOPS; JACKETS IN COMBINATION WITH SKIRTS, WAISTCOATS, TROUSERS, SHIRTS AND TOPS, TROUSERS AND TOPS; LUMBER JACKETS IN COMBINATION WITH SKIRTS AND TOPS, SKIRTS, SKIRTS AND CHEMISES, TROUSERS AND CHEMISES | ABANDONED | Mar 30, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |