Drawing for UNIVERSAL VIDEO

USPTO serial 73506634

UNIVERSAL VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNON, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSAL VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS E. SPATH

THOMAS E SPATH DAVIS, HOKIE, FAITHFULL & HAPGOOD45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042MAIL ORDER SALES OF VIDEO ACCESSORIES, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENTABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 11, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 17, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance