USPTO serial 73506964
SIMPSON ULTRA-LOW PROFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMPSON ULTRA-LOW PROFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A. BARDIN
RICHARD A BARDIN FULWIDER, PATTON, LEE & UTECHT10877 WILSHIRE BLVDTEN FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | CORONARY BALLOON DILATATION CATHETERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SIMPSON ULTRA-LOW PROFILE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 4, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 21, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 29, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |