USPTO serial 73506983
THERM-O-SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERM-O-SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G. MILLS, III
JOHN G MILLS III MILLS AND COATS, PA909 GLENWOOD AVEPOST OFFICE BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | FIBER-COATED BITUMINOUS RESIN ROOF COATINGS | ABANDONED | Oct 15, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |