Drawing for PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

USPTO serial 73507847

PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN G. MILLS III

JOHN G MILLS III MILLS AND COATS, PA909 GLENWOOD AVEPOST OFFICE BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ALARM SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, NAMELY, BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARMSABANDONEDJan 1, 1975
035BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARM MONITORING SERVICESABANDONEDApr 1, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 9, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 9, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 14, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance