USPTO serial 73507957
MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1498332Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 1988
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J. KONDRACKI
EDWARD J KONDRACKI KERKAM, STOWELL, KONDRACKI & CLARKE, PCTWO SKYLINE PL5203 LEESBURG PIKE, STE 600FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MACHINE READABLE CARD CONTAINING A MICROPROCESSOR WITH PROGRAM AND STORAGE MEMORY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MICRO CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |