USPTO serial 73508254
PDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD M. NEWMAN
GERALD M NEWMAN SCHOENBERG, FISCHER & NEWMAN, LTDSTE 2700222 S RIVERSIDE PLZCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MANANGEMENT AND CONSULTANT NEWSLETTERS AND MANUALS FOR MARKETING ACCOUNTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1980 |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1980 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF MARKETING ACCOUNTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PDI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1985 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 12, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |