Drawing for HORN

USPTO serial 73509105

HORN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1381941Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 11, 1986
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HORN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Rundelli

Raymond Rundelli Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP800 Superior AvenueSuite 1400Cleveland, OH 44114-2688

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CONCRETE CURING COMPOUNDS, CONCRETE SEALING COMPOUNDS, CONCRETE HARDENING COMPOUNDS, CONCRETE TOPPING COMPOUNDS, CONCRETE BONDING AGENTS, CONCRETE FORM RELEASE COMPOUNDS AND CONCRETE WATERPROOFING AND DAMPPROOFING COMPOUNDSEXPIRED—
003[ GREASE AND STAIN REMOVING COMPOUNDS FOR USE ON CONCRETE ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
017PRE-MOLDED JOINT FILLERS FOR USE BETWEEN CONCRETE SECTIONS AND EXTRUDED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE WATERPROOF JOINT MATERIALEXPIRED—
019CAULKS, JOINT SEALANTS AND GROUTS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH CONCRETE; AND CONCRETE PATCHING COMPOUNDSEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 1992C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 17, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 11, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 19, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1985CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance