USPTO serial 73509827
MONEY MARKET PREFERRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONEY MARKET PREFERRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
SHEARSON LEHMAN/AMERICAN EXPRESS INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by SHEARSON LEHMAN/AMERICAN EXPRESS INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD A. CLAYTON
RONALD A CLAYTON FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO277 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10172UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEARSON LEHMAN/AMERICAN EXPRESS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MONEY MARKET PREFERRED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |