USPTO serial 73509935
AROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPRING VALLEY, CA
SPRING VALLEY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES C. LOGAN II
CHARLES C LOGAN II7373 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 214LA MESA, CA 92041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, NAMELY TOASTERS, WOKS, PERCOLATORS, HOT POTS, RICE COOKERS, ROASTERS, AND BROILERS | ABANDONED | Dec 7, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |