USPTO serial 73509964
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PAUL WEAVER
D PAUL WEAVERSTE 12032001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | OLIVE OIL, PROCESSED OLIVES, CANNED PEAS, JELLIES, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS, BOTTLED PEPPERS AND TOMATO EXTRACT | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | SPICES AND SEASONINGS, NAMELY, EXTRACT OF GARLIC AND ONION, WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE, GREEN PEPPER SAUCE, RED PEPPER SAUCE, GARLIC SALT, MUSTARD, CATSUP, VINEGAR, SEASONING POWDERS, SEASONING SAUCES, MUSTARD SEEDS AND CORIANDER | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 31, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |