USPTO serial 73510048
EP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEROME P. BLOOM & MARTIN P. HOFFMAN
JEROME P BLOOM & MARTIN P HOFFMAN5751 N WEBSTER STP O BOX 14553DAYTON, OH 45414Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1984 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |