USPTO serial 73513634
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. MORGAN
CHRISTOPHER H MORGAN LANEY, DOUGHERTY, HESSIN & BEAVERS101 PARK AVESTE 900OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BRIDGES AND COMPOSITE, PRE-STRESSED STRUCTURAL MEMBERS | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1982 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1986 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |