Drawing for SUBLIMINAL PERSUASION

USPTO serial 73514543

SUBLIMINAL PERSUASION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUBLIMINAL PERSUASION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARL S. CLARK

CARL S CLARK PRICE, HENEVELD, HUIZENGA & COOPER5740 FOREMOST DR S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS CONCERNING SELF-MOTIVATION AND ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENTABANDONEDDec 1, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 27, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 26, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 9, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 13, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1985CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance