USPTO serial 73514651
RSD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RSD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALMONDBURY, HUDDERSFIELD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. CABELL BUSICK
G CABELL BUSICK MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCE310 OFC BLDG1730 RHODE ISLAND AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GEAR BOXES, POWER TRANSMISSION DRIVES, CHANGE SPEED DRIVES, MECHANICAL AND HYDRAULIC ACTUATORS, AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |