USPTO serial 73515302
ETA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. ANGUS
ROBERT M ANGUS CONTROL DATA CORPORATION--HQS04HP O BOX 0MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; PRINTERS; DISK DRIVES; TAPE DRIVES; INPUT/OUTPUT TERMINALS; KEYBOARDS; KEYBOARD TERMINALS; COMPUTER DISKS AND TAPES; VIDEO DISPLAY APPARATUS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR THE FORGOING | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | TEXTBOOKS, WORKBOOKS, OPERATOR'S AND USER'S MANUALS AND GUIDES, ALL RELATING TO COMPUTERS AND DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | DATA PROCESSING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ENGINEERING, BUSINESS, SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING; AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | REPAIR, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES IN OPERATING, MAINTAINING AND PROGRAMMING DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | RENDERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, TIMESHARING SERVICES, AND DESIGNING SUPERCOMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DATA PROCESING APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETA SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ETA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 2, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |