USPTO serial 73515764
SCULPTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCULPTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MICROPROCESSOR DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
WEST HAMPSTEAD, LONDON, GB
Other trademarks owned by MICROPROCESSOR DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN KUHN MULLER AND BAZERMAN1412 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS, ELECTRONIC MEMORIES COMPRISING COMPUTER PROGRAMS, DISCS, TAPES AND WIRES ALL BEING MAGNETIC AND FOR THE RECORDAL OF DATA | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | USER MANUALS FOR USE WITH COMPUTER PROGRAMS; NEWSLETTERS PERTAINING TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |