USPTO serial 73516012
FELINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FELINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MANNHEIM 1, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEINZ DAWID
HEINZ DAWID WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LINGERIE--NAMELY, BRAS, PANTIES, CHEMISES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |