USPTO serial 73516844
FIREFOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIREFOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMMONWEALTH INDUSTRIAL GASES LIMITED, THE
SURRY HILLS, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Other trademarks owned by COMMONWEALTH INDUSTRIAL GASES LIMITED, THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. DEGRANDI
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI AND KLINETHE FEDERAL BAR BLDG WSTE 1100, 1819 H ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | OXY-FUEL GAS APPARATUS FOR BRAZING, CUTTING, HEATING AND OTHER HEAT TREATMENTS OF METALS COMPRISED OF BLOWPIPES, COMBINED BLOWPIPES AND CUTTING ATTACHMENTS, NOZZLES AND TIPS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |