USPTO serial 73517158
PROSPERITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROSPERITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MOOSE JAW, SASKATCHEWAN, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. CHARLES KENT
CAROL L B MATTHEWS MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCE310 OFC BLDG1730 RHODE ISLAND AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1992 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |