USPTO serial 73517222
MARIE JO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 1987
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MARIE JO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
WICHELEN (SCHELLEBELLE), BE
Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
VAN DE VELDE NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
9260 SCHELLEBELLE, BE
Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
WICHELEN (SCHELLEBELLE), BE
Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
WICHELEN (SCHELLEBELLE), BE
Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN STARSHAK
KATHRYN STARSHAK K&L Gates LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ TOPS, BATHING SUITS, ] LADIES UNDERWEAR, COVER-UPS [, SHIRTS, BLOUSES AND JACKETS ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
- Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
- Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
- Other trademarks owned by VAN DE VELDE GEBROEDERS NAAMLOZE VENNOOTSCHAP
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MARIE JO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1986 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |