USPTO serial 73517747
PAVER SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 1990
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAVER SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RIVIERA BEACH, FL
RIVIERA BEACH, FL
RIVIERA BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. MARTENS
RICHARD L MARTENS BOOSE, CASEY, CIKLIN, LUBITZ, ET AL515 N FLAGLER DR STE 1900WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS IN THE FORM OF FABRICATED PAVING OR CONSTRUCTION BLOCKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 16, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |