USPTO serial 73518609
ELECTROCOM AUTOMATION INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTROCOM AUTOMATION INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM S. ROLSTON, JR.
WILLIAM S ROLSTON JR ELECTROCOM AUTOMATION INC2910 AVE FARLINGTON, TX 76011-5276UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | HIGH-SPEED LETTER SORTING MACHINES FOR SORTING MAIL, MICROFICHE AND THE LIKE | ABANDONED | Nov 21, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1985 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |