USPTO serial 73520904
MILA D'OPIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 1987
- Examiner
- SKORO, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MILA D'OPIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
ST. GALL, CH
Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
ST. GALL, CH
Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
ST. GALL, CH
Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & REZAC150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERIES AND PREPARATIONS FOR THE BODY AND BEAUTY CARE, NAMELY BODY LOTIONS, MOISTURIZERS, BATH SOAPS AND OILS, SKIN CLEANERS, SKIN TONIC, SKIN PEELER, FACIAL SKIN MASKS, SKIN CREAMS, LIQUID FACE MAKE UP, BLUSHERS, EYE SHADOWS, EYELINERS, MASCARA, LIPSTICKS, NAIL POLISH, SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAND CREAMS, DEODORANT CREAMS, SUNTAN LOTIONS, SUNTAN GEL, SUNTAN OIL, AFTER SUN BALM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by MILOPA AG (MILOPA S.A.) (MILOPA LTD.)
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named MILA D'OPIZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1994 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 1986 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |