USPTO serial 73521141
IIMAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINGERET, DONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IIMAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M. LANKENAU
SUSAN M LANKENAU3400 MARINE MIDLAND CTRBUFFALO, NYUNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | THERMAL TRANSFER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, INK COATED PAPER AND RIBBON FOR THE TRANSFER OF IMAGES BY THERMAL PROCESS, WHICH PRODUCTS ARE SOLD TO MANUFACTURE OF OFFICE EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | Oct 3, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |