USPTO serial 73521768
I CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. GUTENKAUF
ROBERT W GUTENKAUF GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, PAPO BOX 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | STICKERS, POSTERS, BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS, PAPER FORMS, LEAFLETS, TRACTS, AND CARDS SUCH AS SPECIAL OCCASION, VISITATION, MEDITATION, REFLECTION, NOTE AND PLEDGE CARDS, DEALING WITH RELIGION, EDUCATION, STEWARDSHIP AND HEALTH CARE; ORNAMENTAL LAPEL BADGES ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SACRED DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named I CARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |