USPTO serial 73523862
ANGSTROM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANGSTROM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E. SCHMIT
DAVID E SCHMIT FROST & JACOBS2500 CENTRAL TRUST CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PHOTOLUMINESCENT CHEMICALS USED FOR MARKING IN A WIDE VARIETY OF INDUSTRIES INCLUDING LABELING, ANTI-COUNTERFEITING AND DOCUMENT SECURITY, PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, BAR CODE AND LABEL ORIENTATION, ROBOTIC VISION GUIDANCE, PACKAGING, PRODUCT ASSEMBLY, MATERIALS HANDLING AND QUALITY CONTROL | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1983 |
| 009 | ELECTRO-OPTICAL INSPECTION SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF AN ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT SOURCE, A SCANNER AND A PHOTOLUMINESCENT CHEMICAL MARKING | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |