USPTO serial 73524474
FLATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 1988
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FLATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRONX, NY
VALLEY STREAM, NY
FARMINGDALE, NY
VALLEY STREAM, NY
ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ
Parsippany, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sana Hakim
Sana Hakim K&L Gates LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FOODS, NAMELY, CRISPY, SUBSTANTIALLY UNLEAVENED BREAD HAVING VARIOUSLY FLAVORED COATINGS | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLD LONDON FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by J. J. BREDFLATS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JJ FLATS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by J. J. BREDFLATS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CPC SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPITA AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FLATS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 18, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 1989 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |