Drawing for ESQUIRE ULTIMATE FITNESS

USPTO serial 73525037

ESQUIRE ULTIMATE FITNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESQUIRE ULTIMATE FITNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT C. FABER

ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN260 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO CASSETTE DEALING WITH PHYSICAL FITNESSABANDONED—
016BOOKS AND A SECTION OF A PERIODICAL PUBLICATION RELATING TO PHYSICAL FITNESSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 4, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 6, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance