USPTO serial 73526145
VITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1452341Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KANKAKEE, IL
KANKAKEE, IL
St. Louis, MO
KANKAKEE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna F. Schmitt
Donna F. Schmitt Armstrong Teasdale LLP7700 Forsyth Blvd., Ste. 1800St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BASED SHORTENING FOR INSTITUTIONAL USE ONLY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BUNGE EDIBLE OIL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BUNGE EDIBLE OIL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BUNGE OILS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUNGE EDIBLE OIL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BUNGE FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named VITO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |