USPTO serial 73526225
SUNBURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNBURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TULSA, OK
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE K. MITCHELL
PAUL H JOHNSON HEAD & JOHNSON228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POTATO CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL PRODUCT GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SUNBURST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 10, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1985 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |