Drawing for Serial No. 73527047

USPTO serial 73527047

Serial No. 73527047

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73527047?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN W. CHESTNUT

JOHN W CHESTNUT TILTON, FALLON, LUNGMUS & CHESTNUT100 S WACKER DR STE 960CHICAGO, IL 60606-4002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021CONTAINERS FOR BUTTER PATSABANDONEDNov 21, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 16, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 29, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1986NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Aug 8, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance