USPTO serial 73528043
CANCER TECH APPLIED ADVANCES IN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 1986
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANCER TECH APPLIED ADVANCES IN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ, JEFFERY SCHWAAB, MACK, ET ALPOST OFFICE BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MEDICAL NEWS JOURNAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1992 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 18, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |