USPTO serial 73528108
BIOGLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOGLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE L. BOLLER
GEORGE L BOLLER STEPHENSON AND BOLLER, PC750 CITY CTR BLDGANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MICROCARRIER BEADS, NAMELY BIOLOGICALLY INERT MICROSPHERES FOR USE IN ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELL CULTURING AND CHARACTERIZED BY SMOOTH GLASSY SURFACES AND A SPECIFIC GRAVITY WHICH RENDERS THE MICROSPHERES NEUTRALLY BUYOYANT IN CELL CULTURING MEDIA | ABANDONED | Mar 5, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |