USPTO serial 73528859
SPORTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARINA DEL REY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. WOODS
ROBERT W WOODS ESQ LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D BEECHEN, INC1875 CENTURY PARK E 8TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER | ABANDONED | Jan 14, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |