USPTO serial 73529628
PRELUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE INFORMATION UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRELUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CONNELLSVILLE, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES T. HOSMER
JAMES T HOSMER NIXON & VANDERHYE PC2000 15TH ST N STE 409ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING FILTERED OIL TO AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION LAND VEHICLE ENGINE, PRIOR TO INITIATING CRANKING OF THE ENGINE, CONSISTING OF A STARTER, OIL PUMP, ADAPTERS, FITTINGS, VALVING AND WIRING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |