USPTO serial 73529838
COMPUTRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPUTRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL P. CHERNOFF
DANIEL P CHERNOFF CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG, ET ALSIXTH & S W WASHINGTON200 WILCOX BLDGPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL COMPUTER STORE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |