Drawing for SIGMA DESIGNS

USPTO serial 73530522

SIGMA DESIGNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGMA DESIGNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN C. FLIESLER

MARTIN C FLIESLER FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOYFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 1740SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ADD-ON AND COMPATIBLE PRODUCTS FOR USE WITH IBM-PC COMPATIBLE COMPUTERS, NAMELY: GRAPHICS CARD, MULTI-FUNCTION BOARD, EXPANSION CHASSIS, TAPE BACK-UP UNIT, ONE REEL TAPE BACK-UP UNIT, HARD DISC DRIVE, SELF-POWERED, STAND-ALONE EXPANSION SUBSYSTEMS COMPRISING EXPANSION CARDS AND DRIVES, AND DISPLAY MONITORSABANDONEDJan 28, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 1988ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 2, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 19, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 16, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance