USPTO serial 73530858
HACIENDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HACIENDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIM M. COOPER
KIM M COOPER KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEARSTE 1600610 NEWPORT CTR DRNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |