USPTO serial 73531484
ERCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS H. MAY, JR.
DOUGLAS H MAY JR OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNCILNL INDUSTRIES, INCP O BOX 60087HOUSTON, TX 77205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESERVOIR ENGINEERING AND GEOLOGICAL SERVICES RELATED TO THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |