USPTO serial 73531836
CANCER CONSULTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 1987
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANCER CONSULTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUNTINGTON, NY
ROSLYN HEIGHTS, NY
ROSLYN HEIGHTS, NY
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Heller and Amanda Laura Nye
SUSAN L HELLER GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP2450 COLORADO AVE STE 400ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MEDICAL JOURNAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 8, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOMINUS PUBLISHING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOMINUS PUBLISHING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CMP HEALTHCARE MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CANCER CONSULTATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| May 12, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 3, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |