Drawing for STANDARD

USPTO serial 73531897

STANDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SKORO, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN

C MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMANEIGHTH FL1801 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING TENNIS COURSESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 1987ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 22, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 26, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 6, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance