Drawing for PRO ORGANO

USPTO serial 73532145

PRO ORGANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUDGE, CONNIE M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO ORGANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD E. JENKINS

RICHARD E JENKINS200 S SQ CORPORATE CTR II3708 MAYFAIR STDURHAM, NC 27707

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AUDIO CASSETTE TAPES AND COMPACT DISCS OF CLASSICAL ORGAN RECORDINGSABANDONEDSep 1, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 28, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 5, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 29, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 23, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1987NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Aug 25, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1986REINREINSTATED—
Feb 19, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1986ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 25, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance