USPTO serial 73532507
MIRABELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRABELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LACHINE, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT G. MCMORROW
ROBERT G MCMORROW SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS1776 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FISH AND SEAFOOD | ABANDONED | Mar 26, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |